Pues, entonces...

Joder! 

Me parece que con cada dìa que pasa, con cada libro que leo, y con cada frase de las noticias y los comentarios polìticos que oigo, me siento menos cierto de què justa es la sociedad en que vivo. Seguro - oigo bastante de comentarios que insinúan el sexismo, la intolerancia religiosa, y el etnocentrismo que componen el sistema central de nuestro paìs. Sin embargo, lo que me molesta màs es la situaciòn del racismo y su estado actual en nuestra cultura. 

Nos mentimos (como paìs) diariamente, dicièndonos que ya se ha muerto el racismo (es decir, en todas las formas grandes), pero es esto la verdad? Creo que no es asì. Creo que nos seguìmos diciendo estas mentiras con la ilusiòn y la esperanza que todos los problemas, todos los puntos de vista de los ciudadanos que no son "blancos", se van a ir asì como asì. Por esto yo escribo del racismo. Voy a seguir asì hasta que nos dejemos de mentir y hasta que podamos decir verdaderamente que este es un paìs justo para todos con respeto a "las razas". Hasta que suceda eso, no voy a dejar de comentar en estas abominaciònes. 

Bueno. Pues, ya lo dejo.

Identity Politics and Sotomayor

This is an excellent article from the Washington Post called "Whose Identity Politics"?

It calls out Whites for the "code language" that is used to cover up their "inherent objectivity".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/13/AR2009071302605.html?hpid=opinionsbox1 

An excerpt:

Being white and male is seen instead as a neutral condition, the natural order of things. Any "identity" -- black, brown, female, gay, whatever -- has to be judged against this supposedly "objective" standard.

Thus it is irrelevant if Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. talks about the impact of his background as the son of Italian immigrants on his rulings -- as he did at his confirmation hearings -- but unforgivable for Sotomayor to mention that her Puerto Rican family history might be relevant to her work. Thus it is possible for Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) to say with a straight face that heritage and experience can have no bearing on a judge's work, as he posited in his opening remarks yesterday, apparently believing that the white male justices he has voted to confirm were somehow devoid of heritage and bereft of experience.

Pool Restrictions in the 21st Century.

So...segregation ended, right? We're all equal now. Everybody gets a fair shake. Nobody has any reason to cry racism except those victim mongering racists like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Not whites. No, no, no, Whites are 'above' that type of behavior now. The U.S. is "post-racial" now. I mean, come on! Our President is multiracial, half-black, half-white! How can we have systematic racism? Get over it!

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Pool-Boots-Kids-Who-Might-Change-the-Complexion.html

Right. Sure. Well, I guess somebody had better let those kids know that. Let them know that whenever they get into the pool and the white kids get out, that's all part of our "post-racial" America they're raised in.

I guess somebody had better tell the kids with the troublesome complexion that they're the problem, that their dark skin brings bad vibes with it, as opposed to the inherently "good vibes" of the children with a lighter complexion (in the article, a fear is expressed that the black kids complexion would be a reason that the atmosphere of the pool area would change).

I guess fending the parents off with "refund money" is just fine. Nevermind the message that this sends to young children who are Black. "Hey, you're not allowed in. Here, just take your money back that you paid and go find some other pool. Your complexion is bad for the pool atmosphere and vibe."

Is this all part of our "post-racial" society?

Verdict on Iran

So, Iran is experiencing some social division over their recent election. The news hails this as a sign of good for the future of Iran and it's government. Part of me is in agreement, but another part of me is sceptical. This is certainly not the first time that the U.S. has had some vested interest in the outcome of an election, war, or conflict in the Middle East. Usually, our hope for the outcome is that which supports our hope for continued hegemony in the area and the protection of our petroleum based interests. So, forgive me if I'm not all excited and pumped for the internal conflict going on. 

I'm not saying that I support the current regime. It is plenty reprehensible for injustices it has committed. But in looking at the current regime and their attitudes towards the U.S., isn't it only fair to judge their attitudes and actions in context to their history with us?

After 9/11, there were a slew of conservatives digging into the Koran for proof that Islam was a violent, hateful religion, and that "these people" were just "that way". Liberals kept wanting to learn more about Muslims and their culture to understand the radical actions. What troubled me was not the focus on Islam for good or bad reasons, but the lack of focus on our actions that may have contributed to a mindset. There was no slew of academics or cultural movement to study our past in the Middle East, our support of regimes, and our moves to maintain hegemony in the region. 

The U.S., from the backing of the installing of the Shah, to the propping up and taking down of Saddam, to almost unconditional backing of Zionist Israel, has had it's hands in the Middle East for decades. Has the U.S. been so mentally vacant as to assume that there is something 'wrong in THEIR culture' and not ours? Do we share none of the blame and therefore none of the responsibility to change? 

In calling three countries an Axis of Evil that must be stopped, invading one, and then acting hostile to the others, are we to be suddenly shocked and indignant over the latter two's actions of self-defense in their arms industry? Again, I am not condoning nuclear proliferation, but rather attempting to open up honest discourse on our actions and our policy in regards to other countries. If we can't look at ourselves honestly, how can we honestly and fairly judge the actions of others? Not doing so is a recipe for problems, as far as I'm concerned. 

The U.S. should take up more personal responsibility for it's own actions and policies that may have lead to current conditions. Im glad Americans, not to mention our President, want to stay out of Iran's conflict. However, because I'm aware of our lack of self-reflection, I'm suspicious as to what our inaction and support really signifies. 

Misconceptions

One of the biggest misconceptions I think Whites have about 'White Privilege' is the whole idea of what is meant by 'privilege'. I gather this in that one of the most common responses I have to the idea is "But, we didn't have a lot of money!" or something to that tune. This is a response to a charge of class privilege that has been thrown into a different discussion as a red herring, whether intentional or not.

Of course not all whites are wealthy. Such a statement is indeed ludicrous. So then, if not all Whites are wealthy, and there are of course wealthy minorities, how can one say Whites have racial privilege over minorities in America?

Simple: People tend to compete in society amongst those in their own wealth class. 

If there is a poor white man and a rich black man, chances are the latter of the two is looking for a job in a different part of the city (or state/country) than the former. So here, class differences do not matter. It's a question of whether or not a rich white man coming into play with the rich black man has any bearing on the outcome of competition.

Another misconception is that after confronting an owning up to Whiteness/White Privilege, whites seek to absolve themselves of their bad feelings by saying "I renounce my privilege!"

You see, just because one isn't a signatory doesn't mean one isn't a beneficiary. Whites can't wish away their privileges by acting nice, "going ethnic" (whatever that means), or some other seemingly altruistic act of multiculturalist goodness. 

Scratch that. There is ONE privilege Whites can give up, but seldom do: the privilege to remain silent about racism and let minorities handle it. 

Whites have the ability to ignore racism and those who fight it. This is a rather large privilege that they can throw off. Simply? No. Gradually? Of course. 

Stereotypes: The fault of those being stereotyped. Right.

So I’m standing in my department at work with a fellow employee. He is of Mexican-American descent. A white female customer approaches him with some questions about a product we carry and he gladly answers, then proceeding to hold a few minutes long conversation with her.

Towards the end of the conversation, my employee friend is asked by this woman whether he can translate some Spanish that is written on a product for her. He says “No”, since he does not speak Spanish.

Blown away at the fact that this brown-skinned, Mexican-American descended young man , she replies in a more than surprised tone, “You DON’T?! Are you serious? Why not?” This is asked due to the interruption of her preconceived notion that all brown folks with Hispanic heritage ought to be able to spout off Spanish to meet her requests.

She then goes on to brag about how she is learning Spanish and how he “really ought to start”, appropriating his cultural priorities for him because she deems it necessary for all brown skinned Hispanics to know Spanish, since that's the preconception she has formed in her mind. I then step forward, translate the product phrase for her (as I am a fluent speaker myself, perhaps the person she was seeking instead) and watch her wish us "Good day" with a somewhat smug smile of self-satisfaction on her face. 

This is White Privilege. She makes a sweeping generalization, a stereotype, and when it is proven wrong, it is the fault of the generalized person and it is on them to change. Non-whites must be given critiques to fit into the mold of how Whites see society and the world at large. This is a situation that even wealthy, well-to-do dark-skinned Hispanics do not often escape. 

Thoughts on the Confederate Flag Apologists

The "Good old Days" and Selective outrage.

Whites love to revel in the past. Whites love to sit and talk about their brave forefathers, how hard they sacrificed, the brave wars they fought in, etc. But there’s a catch: Whites only like to do this when they can revel in positive things about themselves, not so much when it comes to their history of racial oppression on it’s modern day effects.

In Southern Florida, it appears that some White NASCAR fans would like to wave their confederate flag during the races. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,522203,00.html
Start to talk to a white person about slavery and eventually you’ll hear “It’s in the past, nobody owns slaves today, why not just let it go?”, or something similar. Start to talk to them about why they wave the Confederate flag and you’ll hear a litany of reasons, but they’ll never think to say “It’s in the past, we lost, we were defending something (slavery) that was an abomination to humanity, let’s move on”.

White Denial and Rose-Tinted History

You see, Whites who wave that flag (particularly Southern whites) love to go on about the brave Robert E. Lee, go on about the brave men who fought for “states rights” (read that: the right for states to maintain and extend slavery). Whites like to bullshit themselves and sugar coat the past to rationalize their preoccupation with the loss and the fact that they were on the wrong side of the argument of whether humans should be enslaved based off of skin color. The ex-Vice President of the Confederate States himself claimed that White Supremacy was the cornerstone of their culture.

But today Whites rationalize the display of that flag with a number of terrible excuses. The first one being, “It’s a part of Southern Culture and heritage!”

Imagine if a German kid waved the swastika around America or his homeland, claiming it represented his heritage. Why wouldn’t he just wave the German flag? Why does he choose to identify with a flag that took on a completely different meaning from the one of his homelands culture? Similarly, why do Southern Whites not wave the American flag, or even their state flag, to display their heritage and culture? Why wave a flag that represents rebellion against the U.S. and against human rights?

WHOSE Southern heritage, exactly?

One might also notice that it is never Blacks who have generations of family in the south who are making this argument of the flag representing “Southern heritage”. I’ll bet they don’t feel a “cultural tie” to this flag anymore than German Jews feel a cultural tie to the swastika. The truth is that just as the swastika represented a false idea of “Aryan supremacy”, the Southern Flag represents the false idea of “White Supremacy” at any cost, even the rebellion against and separation from the U.S. to maintain it. The confederate flag represents a historical period of White Supremacist rebellion, not "Southern heritage".

So don’t let white people fool you. When they tell you that the Confederate flag represents their heritage, what they’re often saying is either A.) We lost; I’m stuck in the past. Or B. I’m a White Supremacist. Or both.

Just wanted to get that out there.